Differences and similarities existed between development

It is a trick question. You cannot do it. There is no convincing someone who has his mind made up already.

Differences and similarities existed between development

Both empires were relatively tolerant of other faiths, but Mongol empire was The Islamic empire and the Mongol empire emerged as a result of prolonged and bloody military campaigns in many countries extending over a number of different regions.

The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence

Both empires were relatively tolerant of other faiths, but Mongol empire was more pluralistic in regard to religion. The Islamic empire discriminated against non-Muslims while at the same time protected Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians to some degree. Both empires were commercially oriented, albeit to varying degrees.

Differences and similarities existed between development

The Mongols made a point of offering safety and security to foreign merchants to encourage their participation in international trade, which was very profitable to all parties. Both empires stimulated cultural contacts and the exchange of knowledge and technology among various regions and civilizations.

Paper, for example, originated in China and Islamic civilization spread it far and wide. The Mongol empire developed the first effective firearms by combining Eastern and Western metalworking technologies; other countries were quick to adopt this new weaponry.

While the Mongol empire was more tolerant of religious and cultural diversity, it was also more hostile to large urban centers of resistance. The Mongol invasion contributed to the decline of urban settlements in Central Asia in the later Middle Ages.

A.3 What types of anarchism are there? | Anarchist Writers

The Islamic empire also spread the distinctive Islamic civilization, which had a deep and lasting impact on the conquered countries and transformed their culture forever. The Mongol civilization had a much more limited influence; China, the Middle East, and Russia preserved their cultural traditions relatively intact.

While some early Mongol rulers became Christian, most of the later Mongol rulers converted to Islam and embraced its culture. At the same, however, Mongol domination generated fear and resentment among many Islamic scholars, such as Ibn Taimiyya, who continued to argue for jihad against Mongol rulers even after their conversion to Islam.There is one thing you failed to mention that is a difference between schooling and education that I have found pertinent in my life.

“Schooling” teaches one to accept the information that one is given and to not question it so that one can function within the society one lives. Cultural Differences between Australia and England. Australia’s Convict heritage forms a kind of glue that binds it to Britain.

Expert Answers

Of course, British and Australians naturally approach the heritage in a . Two groups of scientists have now succeeded in demonstrating, for the first time, that parallels exist between individual development and phylogeny on the level of gene expression.

Your source for. There exist very substantial differences between the Modernization Theory and The Dependency theory.

A.3 What types of anarchism are there?

It has also been found sometimes that both the theories are antagonistic to each other regarding their views about the international relationships and the development of the world too.

China's Development: Assessing the Implications ()CPDS Home Contact: Structural Incompatibility Puts Global Growth at Risk Are East Asian Economic Models Sustainable? Babes in the Asian Woods Beyond 'The China Choice' Reading China's Mind?

Comments on Australia's Strategic Edge in Friction between China and Japan: The End of the Asian 'Century'? Defense against cultural difference is the state in which one's own culture is experienced as the only viable one.

People at Defense have become adept at discriminating difference, so they experience cultural differences as more “real” than do people at Denial.

Jesus Myth - The Case Against Historical Christ